Mintlify
Documentation platform for developer docs, with an AI assistant that answers readers' questions from your docs.
- Free plan or free version
Most developer time goes into reading code, not writing it. The tools in this category help with that reading. Sourcegraph searches across every repository and code host a company has, which makes it practical to find all callers of a function or every place a library is used before changing it. Swimm keeps documentation for internal code next to the code itself and flags when the code it describes changes.
For docs that other people read, platforms such as Mintlify, ReadMe and GitBook publish developer documentation and API references, and add AI search that answers a reader's question from the published pages. That helps users find answers, but only if the docs are correct to begin with, so the writing still matters more than the search box.
AI makes a few new jobs possible here: drafting first versions of docs from code, explaining an unfamiliar module in plain words, and answering questions about how a system works. Treat those outputs as drafts. A confident explanation of the wrong code path is worse than none, so check generated docs against the code before publishing them.
When choosing, look at where your docs live today, whether the tool syncs with Git, who can edit, and how it handles private repositories and internal docs. For code search, check which code hosts it connects to and whether it can run on your own infrastructure.
What a featured listing costs ยท from $99 a month
Documentation platform for developer docs, with an AI assistant that answers readers' questions from your docs.
Keeps internal code documentation next to the code and up to date, with AI help to explain and document a codebase.
Platform for interactive API documentation and developer hubs, with AI features for writing and searching docs.
Documentation platform that syncs with Git, with AI search that answers questions from your published docs.
Code search across all your repositories and code hosts, used to find usages, examples and the impact of a change.
Developers also use chat and IDE assistants to explain code, which overlaps with this category. The difference is scope and sharing. An explanation in a private chat helps one person once, while documentation in a shared platform, or a code search link pasted into a ticket, helps the whole team and stays findable later.
A practical starting point is the onboarding path. Ask a recent hire which parts of the codebase were hardest to understand, document those first, and set up code search so the next person can find examples without asking.
Keep ownership clear. Docs drift when nobody is responsible for them, and AI-generated pages drift faster because they are cheap to create. Assign an owner to each important page, link docs to the code they describe, and review them when that code changes. Tools such as Swimm help by flagging documentation that refers to code that has since been edited.
Tools such as Sourcegraph search across many repositories and code hosts at once, with precise matching for symbols and patterns. That helps large teams see the full impact of a change.
It can draft it, especially reference pages from code or an OpenAPI file. A person who knows the API should review the drafts, add examples and fix anything the model guessed.
It lets readers ask a question in plain words and returns an answer drawn from your published docs, usually with links to the source pages. Answers are only as good as the docs behind them.
Most can, through access you grant to your code host. Sourcegraph can also be self-hosted. Check each tool's data handling before connecting private code.